Context

Context: Microsoft Word and Microsoft Visio

Note: This list contains all the constructs (and corresponding measuring variables) as defined by the authors when proposing/using/applying the theories/models in the selected context. It also includes the scales used to measure the variables.

• Construct (Theory/Model): A Priori Attitudes (TTF)

  Indicator	Scale	Reference(s)
  Using the tool for creating a flowchart is a bad/good idea.	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  Using the tool for creating a flowchart is a foolish/wise idea.	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  I like/dislike the idea of using the tool for creating a flowchart.	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  Using the tool for creating a flowchart is unpleasant/pleasant.	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)

• Construct (Theory/Model): Group Valence (TTF)

  Indicator	Scale	Reference(s)
  To what extent does your group have a positive orientation toward the tool?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  To what extent does your group have a good feeling about the tool?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  To what extent does your group consider the tool acceptable for use?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  Indicate the extent of attractiveness of using the tool to your group?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)

• Construct (Theory/Model): Group’s Perceptions About the Complexity of the Technology (TTF)

  Indicator	Scale	Reference(s)
  To what extent was the tool difficult for your group to use?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  To what extent are the features of the tool overly sophisticated?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)

• Construct (Theory/Model): Group’s Perceptions About the Task-Technology Fit (TTF)

  Indicator	Scale	Reference(s)
  Did you find the tool appropriate for the flowcharting task that your group was performing?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  Was the flowchart displayed in a readable and understandable format by the tool?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  Was the flowchart presented in a readable and useful format by the tool?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  Were the flowcharting symbols easily available within the tool?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  Were there too many flowcharting symbols available within the tool making it hard to understand which one to use in creating your own flowchart?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)

• Construct (Theory/Model): Group’s Strength of Adoption of the Technology (TTF)

  Indicator	Scale	Reference(s)
  To what extent was your group convinced about using the above tool?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  To what extent is your group committed to the use of the above tool?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  To what extent does your group plan to regularly use the above tool?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)

• Construct (Theory/Model): Intra-group Conflict (TTF)

  Indicator	Scale	Reference(s)
  To what extent did you and the other party disagree over alternatives?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  To what extent was the conflict you and the other party experienced directly related to the task?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  To what extent did you and the other party debate over some of the alternatives?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  To what extent did you and the other party advocate different points of view?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  To what extent were the differences you and the other party experienced task-related?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  To what extent did you and the other party disagree over alternative solutions proposed?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)

• Construct (Theory/Model): Satisfaction (Process Satisfaction) (TTF)

  Indicator	Scale	Reference(s)
  How would you describe your group's problem-solving process? Confusing/Understandable.	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  How would you describe your group's problem-solving process? (efficient/inefficient).	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  How would you describe your group's problem-solving process? Coordinated/Uncoordinated.	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  How would you describe your group's problem-solving process? Fair/Unfair.	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  How would you describe your group's problem-solving process? Satisfying/Unsatisfying.	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)

• Construct (Theory/Model): Satisfaction (Solution Satisfaction) (TTF)

  Indicator	Scale	Reference(s)
  To what extent do you feel personally responsible for the correctness of the group solution?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  To what extent does the final solution reflect your inputs?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  To what extent are you confident that the group solution is correct?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  To what extent do you feel committed to the group's solution?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)
  How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the quality of your group's solution?	Not Specified	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)

• Construct (Theory/Model): Voluntariness (TTF)

  Indicator	Scale	Reference(s)
  The group’s use of the flowcharting tool was voluntary.	Scale 1 to 7, Mandatory Setting to Voluntary Setting	(Sarker & Valacich, 2010)